UBEF Lecture Series | The Contested Middle: Tibetan Debates Regarding How to Understand Madhyamaka – School of Languages and Cultures UBEF Lecture Series | The Contested Middle: Tibetan Debates Regarding How to Understand Madhyamaka – School of Languages and Cultures

UBEF Lecture Series | The Contested Middle: Tibetan Debates Regarding How to Understand Madhyamaka

The Department of Indian Subcontinental Studies presents

UBEF Lecture Series

The Contested Middle: Tibetan Debates Regarding How to Understand Madhyamaka

Professor John Powers, UBEF Visiting Professor of Buddhist Studies

Abstract

All four orders of Tibetan Buddhism agree that Nāgārjuna’s Prāsaṅgika Madhyamaka as interpreted by Buddhapālita and Candrakīrti is the supreme philosophical system, but from the earliest period of Buddhism’s introduction to the Plateau there have been deep disagreements regarding how it should be understood. This talk will focus on the debate sparked by Daktsang Sherap Rin-chen, who accused Tsongkhapa of “eighteen great burdens of contradiction” in his Madhyamaka system. Daktsang is particularly critical of Tsongkhapa’s attempt to bring together the Epistemological tradition of Dignāga and Dharmakīrti — which relies on foundational epistemic warrants (pramāṇa) — and Madhyamaka, which Daktsang asserts is non-foundational and eschews the adoption of any thesis. Daktsang’s broadside sparked rebuttals from some of the leading figures of Tsongkhapa’s Gelukpa order over the course of centuries — including the fifth Dalai Lama, Nga-wang Losang Gyatso, the first Panchen Lama, Losang Chögyen, Jamyang Shepa, and the first Purchok Rinpoche, Ngawang Jampa. The eighth and ninth Karmapas, Mikyö Dorjé and Wangchuk Dorjé, defended Daktsang’s position and extended his critique, developing an even more radical vision of Madhyamaka. This presentation will discuss the main issues at stake in the controversy, particularly the status of conventional truths: given that they are thoroughly intertwined with error, is it feasible to talk about validity for mundane perception? Another related issue is the nature of buddhahood: do buddhas know the conventional? If so, does that mean that their perceptions are tinged with error? If not, are they incapable of knowing half of reality?

About the speaker

John Powers is a Fellow of the Australian Academy of Humanities and author of 18 books and more than 100 articles and book chapters, mainly focused on the Buddhist history of ideas in India and Tibet. His books include A Bull of a Man: Images of Masculinity, Sex, and the Body in Indian Buddhism (Harvard, 2009) and The Buddha Party: How the Chinese Communist Party Works to Define and Control Tibetan Buddhism (Oxford, 2015).

Join online via Zoom (password: 235471)

For more information, contact: Dr Chris Clark – chris.clark@sydney.edu.au

 

Catch up on events

Listen on SoundCloud
Watch webinars on YouTube

Social media

Like us on Facebook
Follow us on Twitter

The event is finished.

Date

Oct 28 2021
Expired!

Time

6:00 PM - 7:30 PM

Location

Online (Zoom)

Comments are closed.